Skip to Main Content

Couple II

© Estate of Louise Bourgeois / The Easton Foundation / Licensed by VAGA at Artists Rights Society (ARS), NY

Image downloads are for educational use only. For all other purposes, please see our Obtaining and Using Images page.

Louise Bourgeois

American, born France, 1911-2010

Couple II, 1996

fabric, knee brace, glass, and wood

couple (overall): 27 x 60 x 32 inches (68.58 x 152.4 x 81.28 cm); vitrine (overall): 65 x 79 x 47 inches (165.1 x 200.66 x 119.38 cm)

Collection Albright-Knox Art Gallery, Buffalo, New York

Sarah Norton Goodyear Fund, 1999


Collection Highlight

More Details


the artist;
Cheim & Read, New York;
sold to the Albright-Knox Art Gallery, July 13, 1999



Work Type

Construction (sculpture)

Information may change due to ongoing research.Glossary of Terms

Often pulling from highly autobiographical roots, Louise Bourgeois’s work is emotionally and sexually charged. During her formative years, the artist’s father overturned their family’s structure with his affairs, sharing a home with both her mother and his young mistress, who was also Bourgeois’s live-in English tutor. A fundamental part of her practice revolved around memory, as she dealt with this and the other traumas of her past through cathartic artmaking experiences. Couple II depicts two anthropomorphic beings who appear human-like from some angles and abstract from others. They are engaged in an intimate embrace. For Bourgeois, this work is a re-creation of a child’s confusion about adult love and sexuality. She has said, “The couple copulating is seen through the eyes of a young girl. Are they fighting? Are they enjoying themselves? Is one killing the other? It refers to the age when I could not understand what they were doing, what they saw in each other, and what they were pursuing in each other. It is the question of an arrested traumatic experience.” Bourgeois added a prosthetic brace to the female figure, implying infirmity. Yet, its significance extends beyond the physical. The brace can also be read as a metaphor for emotional barriers, suggesting a sense of helplessness the figure may feel in the relationship.

Back to Top